Skip to main content

Search NYU Steinhardt

Wendy Y. Perez, Sara McAlister

Center for Policy, Research, and Evaluation

The Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools

This research brief was developed with support from the William T. Grant Foundation.

As jobs that require postsecondary education continue to increase, gaps in postsecondary access and completion by race and socioeconomic status persist. [4] College education is connected to greater health and increased civic engagement. [5] Over the last two decades, college readiness scholarship and practice have embraced the important role that socio-emotional skills play in facilitating academic engagement, persistence, and thriving. [6] These skills and mindsets (including self-efficacy, self-regulation, resilience, positive identities, relationship skills, and other skills) predict academic engagement and achievement, college preparation, and well-being into adulthood. [7]

But socio-emotional learning (SEL) models have faced mounting critiques for their failure to address the structural inequalities and hostile racial climates that BIPOC youth face in both K-12 and postsecondary education. [8] SEL approaches sometimes employ deficit lenses that frame BIPOC youth as lacking skills and dispositions necessary for success in White, middleclass-dominated spaces, rather than affirming their own cultural assets and supporting BIPOC youth to understand and challenge the sociopolitical conditions that limit their opportunity. [9] Responding to this imperative for SEL to mitigate, rather than reproduce, social inequality, Jagers, Rivas-Drake, and Williams articulate a vision for “transformative” SEL. They write,

In essence, we argue that for SEL to adequately serve those from underserved communities—and promote the optimal developmental outcomes for all children, youth and adults—it must cultivate in them the knowledge, attitudes, and skills required for critical examination and collaborative action to address root causes of inequities. [10]

Transformative SEL incorporates dimensions of critical consciousness into socio-emotional competency domains. Originally conceptualized by Freire [11], critical consciousness consists of three dimensions: an understanding of the root causes of social inequalities (i.e. a “critical analysis”); the capacity and commitment to produce sociopolitical change; and participation in individual or collective action to change perceived social inequalities. [12]

This expanded vision of transformative SEL resonates with research on aspirations, persistence, and resilience among BIPOC students. Positive racial identity, awareness of racism and other forms of oppression, and political and civic self-efficacy are associated with academic engagement, aspirations, and persistence among BIPOC youth. [13] For BIPOC college students, especially those in predominantly White postsecondary institutions, persistence and resilience are fortified by having the skills to maintain strong ties to home communities, build culturally affirming communities on campus, and locate their own education in a legacy of resisting oppression. [14]

What settings and experiences support BIPOC youth in building the transformative SEL competencies that support college persistence?

This research brief shares qualitative findings from a mixed-methods study on the developmental trajectories of youth organizing (YO) participants that suggest YO can be a powerful strategy for transformative SEL and college success. First, we offer additional background on the link between youth organizing and transformative SEL. Then, we briefly describe our study and the methods used for this brief. Next, we share findings from interviews with YO alumni, illustrating connections among their YO experiences, transformative socioemotional skills, and perceived college successes. We conclude with recommendations for various stakeholder groups.

Jagers et al.’s transformative SEL framework expands and revises the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL)’s five SEL competency domains to include skills and orientations related to critical consciousness

  • Transformative self-awareness includes understanding one’s own goals, identities, and values and developing a sense of self-efficacy, as well as acknowledging one’s own biases and connecting personal and collective identities and histories (critical self-analysis).
  • Transformative self-management includes self-regulation and stress management, resilience, and civic efficacy, as well as resistance and efficacy in pursuing collective goals.
  • Transformative social awareness involves a sense of belonging and understanding interpersonal and institutional social norms for behavior, as well as perspective-taking informed by critical historical understanding and recognizing family, school and community resources for well-being.
  • Transformative relationship skills include communication and interpersonal skills to maintain healthy relationships, as well as collaborative problem-solving, leadership, and the ability to navigate differing social and cultural norms.
  • Transformative responsible decision-making includes the skills to engage in caring and constructive behavior as well as the ability to critically examine social and institutional norms, realistically evaluate the consequences of different actions, and prioritize collective wellbeing. [15]

Return to Landing Page

Next Sections

Youth Organizing and Transformative SEL

Youth organizing (YO) is a community-based practice that engages young people to collectively identify and analyze issues impacting them and use public action to advocate for solutions.

Read More

Methods

In this brief, we share themes from 36 interviews with 25 youth organizing participants who completed high school during the study.

Read More

Findings

We discuss four key findings in this section.

Read More

Summary of Findings

This research brief illuminates how youth organizing can be a powerful strategy for transformative SEL and college success for BIPOC students.

Read More

Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research

This section lists implications for educators, youth workers, policymakers, funders, colleges, and researchers.

Read More

Conclusion

YO offers a supportive and affirming context for SEL while also explicitly building young people’s critical social analysis and their efficacy around critical action for social justice.

Read More

Footnotes

[4] A.P Carnevale, T. Jayasundera, & A. Gulish, America’s Divided Recovery: College Haves and Have-Nots (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, 2016); Indicator 20: Undergraduate enrollment (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, February 2019).

[5] J. Ma, M. Pender, & M. Welch, Education pays 2016: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Trends in Higher Education Series (New York: College Board, 2016).

[6] C. A. Farrington, M. Roderick, E. Allensworth, J. Nagaoka, T.S. Keyes, D. W. Johnson, & N. O. Beechum, Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review (Chicago, University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, 2012); P. C. Kyllonen, Measurement of 21st century skills within the Common Core State standards. Washington, DC: Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments, 2012).

[7] J. Nagaoka, C. A. Farrington, S. B. Erlich, and R. Heath, Foundations for young adult success: A developmental framework (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, 2012); J. J. Heckman, “Schools, skills, and synapses” Economic Inquiry, 46, n. 3 (2008): 289–324; D. S. Yeager, & G. M. Walton, “Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic,” Review of Educational Research, 81, no. 2 (2011): 267–301.

[8] S. Seider, D. Graves, A. El-Amin, S. Clark, M. Soutter, J. Tamerat, P. Jennett, K. Gramigna, J. Yung, M. Kenslea, & S. Sklarwitz, “Preparing adolescents attending progressive and no excuses urban charter high schools to analyze, navigate, and challenge race and class inequality,” Teachers College Record 118, N. 12 (2016), 1-54; T. N. Barnes, “Changing the landscape of social emotional learning in urban schools: What are we currently focusing on and where do we go from here?” Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 51, n. 4 (2019): 599-637.

[9] J. Mahfouz & V. Anthony-Stevens, “Why trouble SEL? The need for cultural relevance in SEL,” Bank Street Occasional Paper Series N. 43 (New York: Bank Street College of Education, 2020).

[10] R. Jagers, D. Rivas-Drake, and B. Williams, “Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence,” Educational Psychologist, 54, n. 3(2019): 163.

[11] Freire, P., Pedagogy of the oppressed (New York, NY: Herder and Herder, 1973).

[12] M. A. Diemer, L. J. Rapa, C. J. Park & J. C. Perry, “Development and validation of the critical consciousness scale,” Youth & Society, 49, n. 4 (2017): 461-483.

[13] C. O’Connor, “Dispositions toward (collective) struggle and educational resilience in the inner city: A case analysis of six African-American high school students,” American Educational Research Journal, 34, n. 4 (1997): 593–629; T. M. Chavous, D. H. Helkene Bernat, K. Schmeelk-Cone, C. H. Caldwell, L. Kohn-Wood & M. A. Zimmerman, “Racial identity and academic attainment among African-American adolescents,” Child Development, 74, n. 4 (2003): 1076-1090; P. J. Luginbuhl, E. H. McWhirter, & B. T. McWhirter, (2015), “Sociopolitical development, autonomous motivation, and education outcomes: Implications for low-income Latina/o adolescents,” Journal of Latina/o Psychology,4,n. 1 (2016): 43-59; M. A. Diemer, “Pathways to occupational attainment among poor youth of color: The role of sociopolitical development,” The Counseling Psychologist, 37, no. 1 (2009): 6–35; G. A. Cadenas, B. L. Bernstein, & T. J. G. Tracey, “Critical consciousness and intent to persist through college in DACA and U.S. citizen students: the role of immigration status, race and ethnicity,” Culturally Diverse Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24 , n. 4 (2018): 564-575.

[14] T. J. Yosso, W. A. Smith, M. Ceja, $ D. G. Solórzano, “Critical race theory, microagressions, and campus racial climate for Latino/a undergraduates,” Harvard Educational Review, 79, n. 4 (2009): 659-690; D. G. Solórzano & D. Delgado-Bernal, “Transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context,” Urban Education, 26, n. 3 (2001): 308-342; S. Museus & S. J. Quaye, “Toward and intercultural perspective or racial and ethnic minority college persistence,” Review of Higher Education, 11, no. 4
(2009): 67-94. 

[15] Jagers, et al., p. 166.

Previous Sections

About the PRE Research Brief: Student and Family Voices Series

The Student and Family Voices research brief series poses policy, practice, and research implications for students, parents/caregivers, educators, policy makers, school districts, nonprofits and communities.

Read More

About the Youth Organizing Trajectories Study

This brief is part of a larger study, funded by the William T. Grant Foundation, on how participating in YO influences young people’s developmental and academic trajectories.

Read More

Executive Summary

This brief shares findings from a longitudinal study of six established youth organizing (YO) groups (among approximately 300 nationwide).

Read More