Edward Seidman
How are the developmental pathways of urban at-risk adolescents affected by school and neighborhood settings, and how can this knowledge inform the creation of programs and policies to promote positive youth development?
My current work reflects my long-standing interests in two fundamental issues/questions. Understanding the relationship between the pattern of transactions among people and their social contexts, or what I refer to as social regularities (Seidman, 1988), and the identification of the strategies, tactics, and loci of intervention to alter the social regularities of a setting and promote positive psychological development. I also continue to work on critical conceptual and methodological issues, e.g., culturally anchored methodology (Hughes & Seidman, 2002), holistic perspectives and methods (Seidman & Pedersen, 2003), and integrative chapters and volumes in community psychology (Rappaport & Seidman, 2000; Revenson & Seidman, 2002). I am also a member of the newly funded National Science Foundation Center of Culture, Development, & Education (CRCDE). I am particularly interested in the culture of schools and classrooms and how these "cultures" impact the well known "achievement gap."
Degrees Held
- Ph.D.
University of Kentucky
1969
Clinical Psychology & Medical Behavioral Science - MA
Temple University
1965
Psychology - BS
Pennsylvania State University
1963
Psychology
Awards
- 2001 : Resident Scholar, Rockefeller Foundation's Bellagio Center (Italy)
- 2001 : Ethnic Minority Mentorship Award, The Society for Community Research and Action: A Division of the APA
- 2000 : Outstanding Alumnus Award (sustained excellence in research, teaching, and service), University of Kentucky
- 1999 : Outstanding Contributions to Education and Training in Community Research and Action (Inaugural Award), Council of Program
- 1990 : Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award, The Society for Community Research and Action: A Division of the APA President
- 1987 : Division of Community Psychology, APA
- 1978 : Exemplary Project-Adolescent Diversion Project, Child Welfare Information Exchange, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare
- 1977 : Fulbright-Hays Senior Research Scholar, University of Athens (Greece)
- 1976 : Consulting Psychology Research Award, First Prize, Division of Consulting Psychology, APA
- 1975 : Exemplary Project-Community-Based Adolescent Diversion Program, National Institute of Law Enforcement Administration Agency, U.S. Dept. of Justice
Research Interests
Adolescent Development in the Urban Context
Since joining the faculty at NYU, I have been conducting a longitudinal study of over 1400 economically at-risk urban adolescents, known as the Adolescent Pathways Project (APP; Seidman, 1991). The bulk of my work on the APP has focused on several major issues: a) understanding how the normative transitions from elementary to junior high school and from junior to senior high school impact developmental trajectories; b) developing a holistic understanding of how the unique constellations of daily transactions of youth with their family, peers, school, and neighborhood are associated with different developmental outcomes; and c) discovering and understanding profiles of contextual competence.
Normative School Transitions
The transition into junior high school seems to be far more problematic than the transition into high school. While academic performance drops across both transitions, self-esteem only declines across the transition to junior high school (Seidman et al, 1994, 1996). These changes do not vary as a function of student gender or race/ethnicity. After making the transition to junior high school the students become more disengaged from the educational enterprise: They report increased academic hassles, decreased support from teachers, and reduced extracurricular involvement. Two years after this school transition, these effects are not attenuated. Currently, we are examining the long-term effects, i.e., five years later, of these normative transitions and the potential factors that moderate and mediate these effects, e.g., racial/ethnic identity..
As we have begun to look at individual trajectories of self-esteem across the transition to junior high school and beyond, we find that there are seven different patterns of change in self-esteem over time, not one. Only two of these self-esteem trajectories experience immediate and dramatic declines in self-esteem across the transition year even though they were relatively high in self-esteem before commencing the transition to junior high school. These two trajectories are not differentiated from the other two trajectories that began high in self-esteem in terms of any personality or individual demographic variables. On the other hand, the students constituting the trajectories that declined dramatically were more likely to reside in under-resourced neighborhoods and families. These families appeared too over taxed to be able to provide the support needed for youth to successfully make this difficult school transition.
Holistic Views of Family, Peers, and Neighborhood Settings
In a series of studies, we have looked holistically at youth perceived daily hassles, social support, and involvement with family, peer, and neighborhood (Seidman et al., 1998, 1999). Within each setting youth describe a series of dramatically different constellations of perceived transactions. These different constellations of transactions place youth at differential levels of risk/protection, in terms, of self-esteem, depression, and antisocial behavior. When we examine the joint effects of family and peer profiles on self-esteem, we find a strong association between family and peer profiles that are similar, yet peer transactions also partially mediate the association between family transactions and self-esteem (Roberts et al., 2000).
Contextual Competence
Most recently, we have uncovered nine distinct constellations of youths' behavioral and perceptual self-reports of engagement and performance with peer, school, athletic, employment, cultural, and religious contexts when they are 16 to 17 years of age. We refer to these as profiles of contextual competence (Pedersen et al., under review). Overall, profiles with high engagement in only a single context, such as religion or athletics, do not buffer youths from negative developmental outcomes. Profiles representing high engagement and performance with two or more contexts are associated with higher self-esteem and lower depression. At the same time, profiles marked by high engagement in the risky contexts of athletics or employment are associated with greater delinquency. These results have important implications for planning of services by youth organizations. Using these profiles of contextual competence in conjunction with the youth's time diaries, we plan to examine the association between profile and time use. We also plan to examine the direct and indirect effects of family and peer transactions during early adolescence on the profiles of contextual competence that emerge in middle adolescence.
Intervention and Policy
Our research on school transitions has lead to evidence-based major policy recommendations for educational reform (Seidman, Aber, & French, 2003; Seidman, in preparation). We have found that the transition to the junior high school is riskier than the transition to senior high school because a greater developmental mismatch occurs at the time of the transition to junior high school. That is, early adolescents experience numerous biological, cognitive, emotional, and social changes. These changes occur at a time when students make the shift from an elementry school setting in which all the students and teachers are known to each other to one in which they are shuffled from one unfamiliar teacher and set of classmates to another classroom every 40 minutes. Our findings, in conjunction with other literature, lead us to recommend that: a) more resources and attention be directed toward the organization of schooling during early adolescence; b) ideally, early adolescents should attend K-8 schools; and c) when K-8 schools are not feasible, middle grades schools need to be reorganized into smaller and more stable environments attuned to the developmental needs of early adolescents to maintain their engagement in the educational enterprise.